Kubernetes-like management - Software Architect Amadeus Employee Review

2.0
Jun 2, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Work-life balance is the best if you don't care about your work and let someone else do the job. With the transition to SAFe, it doesn't matter if you under-commit, as long as the team reaches their objectives (tip: setting the user stories as 'done' is enough)

Cons

Work-life balance is hard if you are committed to your job and want to reach some technical excellence: as many people join the company for the advantage mentioned above, some people still have to do the job. Unfortunately, the management is considering the staff as Kubernetes considers your resources: as cattle. If one leaves, just hire a new one. If there is not enough capacity, just add more people. If the deadline are too short, just add more teams. Over the hard time of the covid-19, many experimented engineers have left, replaced by junior developers mostly in the India development center. So the new focus is about delivery, not quality, and bugs and technical debt will be taken care in due time, when pigs fly. It's also worth mentioning that over the time, the benefits are being cut off and the salaries are not attractive anymore for the region.

Explore other reviews about Amadeus

2.0
Oct 27, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Learning opportunities, every day brought something new to tackle or explore - Decent benefits package that covered the essentials - Competitive salary relative to industry standards

Cons

- Management is aggressively enforcing a hybrid model, even for remote employees, and is rescinding previously agreed upon contracts. There's a glaring lack of strategic vision from leadership. - If you're based in Europe or North America, job security is virtually nonexistent unless you're in upper management. Roles are being shifted to India, Colombia, and the Philippines, with cost-cutting prioritized over talent, experience, or loyalty. - The forced migration to Azure, compounded by poor planning, is draining resources. And employees are paying the price — not just through increased workload, but by being let go in recent layoffs (October '25). With many of the positions eliminated quietly transferred to offshore. - Layoffs are being justified as “market alignment” and financial necessity. Yet at the same time, the company continues to absorb small to medium-sized companies, raising serious questions about transparency, priorities, and long-term stability.

22
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All