India is not the focus and priority, avoid joining, there is no growth prospects. - Software Engineer AlphaSense Employee Review

1.0
Dec 27, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

1: Strong Product: The product itself is good and has potential in the market. 2: IPO or Acquisition Potential: The company might go public or be acquired, which could add value for existing (old) employees who have okayish stock options.

Cons

1: Lack of Belief in India: The company views India merely as a cost-effective solution, not as a strategic hub of talent. 2: No Leadership Opportunities in India: All significant engineering leadership roles (staff, director, and above) are filled in Finland and Europe, leaving India to follow orders without real decision-making power. 3: Transitioning Products: Key products are being transitioned to Tegus in Canada, and product management appears disorganized. 4: Sentieo Acquisition Fallout: The company never fully integrated or believed in the Sentieo acquisition, leading to the departure of most people from that team. 5: Limited Work Scope in India: India teams are assigned basic content work, while critical search and AI-based projects are handled in Finland/EU. 6: Poor Leadership Engagement: The CEO visited India only once in five years, that too after layoffs, seemingly just to pacify remaining employees. 7: Stock Option Disappointment: No attractive stock options have been offered for a long time, reducing the overall incentive to stay. 8: Better Options Elsewhere: Many companies now offer better growth and focus for India-based employees; consider exploring them instead of joining AlphaSense.

Explore other reviews about AlphaSense

5.0
Jun 2, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good culture, seniors are patient

Cons

Low pay and bonus compared to market

3.0
May 28, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Flexibility (full autonomy over schedule and location), office perks, tons of resources for self development

Cons

Increasingly toxic and cutthroat culture. Pay is below market rate. Quality appears to be less of a leadership priority and there is extreme inconsistency in terms of internal talent. Lots of closed-door conversations happening by leadership. No feasible upward mobility if you didn't start at the right time a few years ago.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All