employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Alcatel-Lucent

Acquired by Nokia

Is this your company?

these were the best days, these were the worst days... - Senior SQA Alcatel-Lucent Employee Review

4.0
Sep 9, 2008
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Over the previous years ALU has been a very stable place to work, It seemed to weather the 2001 downturn better that Nortel. A great thing about Alcatel-Lucent is its people. Very talented people all over the world. The work environment is excellent, respectful and professional. You feel at home here. ALU has great potential : in the IP space and the DLS access space.

Cons

The extensive use of outsourcing in the last few years is not quite working as it should. there are issues with time zones, training of the people overseas. I personally spent nearly a year training/supporting engineers remotely in India and China. Sometimes there is simply no way those people could get to be as efficient and knowledgeable in two months as the people they replaced that had been doing that for 10 years. Specially true in the domain of testing. ALU sometimes feels too big, the merger is a 'catastrophe' (some competing products were still being developed as of two months ago!!)

Explore other reviews about Alcatel-Lucent

5.0
Jan 12, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

ALU afforded me many opportunities and the pay was great.

Cons

I can't think of any

2.0
Jun 11, 2008
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The workers at Alcatel-Lucent, at least the former Lucent employees since I worked almost exclusively with these folks, were among some of the smartest and most conscientous I ever worked with. The people who tried really cared and carried the company.

Cons

Alcatel brought with it a lot of the classic characteristics of bad French management. ("Why make it simple when we can make it complex?") Lucent has all the characteristics of a former 100-year old monolpoly. Its management is full of managers who never had to be efficient or organized (since it was based on a "cost plus" revenue system while Ma Bell ran the US phone system). In fact, the more people it hired and the more it spent on useless ideas, the more money it made! It has horrible compensation systems for its management and salesforce (paying for sales, not for profits). The company is very badly organized and while some departments are working 60+ hour weeks, others are fairly useless and make it hard for the productive groups to get real, very needed work done. They promote rah-rah cheerleaders into management who have no clue how to manage except to support the people who suck up to them. There is no well-integrated strategy for the company, and this leads to scattershot efforts at doing anything to have a good quarter, even if it means robbing next quarter's sales and profits.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All