employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Alcatel-Lucent

Acquired by Nokia

Is this your company?

Good/OK employer, outlook is always made to seem like doom and gloom to avoid promotions, raises and career development. - Software Engineer II Alcatel-Lucent Employee Review

3.0
Apr 1, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I have been working at Alcatel-Lucent full-time for more than 10 years. Peers are nice, the work environment is good and the job is fairly stable - if you work extra hard. Flexible work hours but you WILL need to bring your work home with you if you want to be home for supper. Some Great people left.

Cons

As a whole the company has been on a constant decline for over a decade now. Sustaining life through acquisition and mergers. Was awesome at the start but now there's not much to get excited about. Risky career development - choose wisely. Not as much opportunity to grow as one would think. Not agile, practice Kanban though. You do not necessarily get what you put in - long hours for a pat on the back. No salary increase in years and the incentive plan is rarely paid out. Great people make great companies .. we are down on the amount of great people left.

Explore other reviews about Alcatel-Lucent

5.0
Jan 12, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

ALU afforded me many opportunities and the pay was great.

Cons

I can't think of any

2.0
Jun 11, 2008
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The workers at Alcatel-Lucent, at least the former Lucent employees since I worked almost exclusively with these folks, were among some of the smartest and most conscientous I ever worked with. The people who tried really cared and carried the company.

Cons

Alcatel brought with it a lot of the classic characteristics of bad French management. ("Why make it simple when we can make it complex?") Lucent has all the characteristics of a former 100-year old monolpoly. Its management is full of managers who never had to be efficient or organized (since it was based on a "cost plus" revenue system while Ma Bell ran the US phone system). In fact, the more people it hired and the more it spent on useless ideas, the more money it made! It has horrible compensation systems for its management and salesforce (paying for sales, not for profits). The company is very badly organized and while some departments are working 60+ hour weeks, others are fairly useless and make it hard for the productive groups to get real, very needed work done. They promote rah-rah cheerleaders into management who have no clue how to manage except to support the people who suck up to them. There is no well-integrated strategy for the company, and this leads to scattershot efforts at doing anything to have a good quarter, even if it means robbing next quarter's sales and profits.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All