employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Agilent Technologies

Engaged employer

Good for work life balance, bad for advancement - Senior Financial Analyst Agilent Technologies Employee Review

2.0
Dec 2, 2008
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The quality of life allowed by working at Agilent is truly extraordinary. Work schedules are extremely flexible, with managers being even more accomodating of working at home or odd hours for employees with children. People are also genuinely nice, treating others and their ideas with an impressive mix of respect and candor. Management really does try to manage "properly" - according to commonly accepted rules of good management.

Cons

Because Agilent is a flat organization with unusually low turnover (lots of "lifers" who love the culture) opportunities for advancement are scarce. This is particularly frustrating for people with ambition. Management of the operations of the company is broken. It's far too bureaucratic and slow. In an extremely complex business, more power should be given to individual managers, who better understand their customers and products. As it is, corporate management distrusts product line managers and this distrust manifests itself in micromanagement of budgets and projects.. This phenomenon may have existed for decades and as a result there is a total lack of leadership at lower management levels. The age old problem of bureacracies exists here, you're not rewarded for successes, you're punished for mistakes. The result is that small successes are celebrated because no one takes chances that could lead to big successes.

Explore other reviews about Agilent Technologies

5.0
Jun 22, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good teammates, work life balance and salary

Cons

None i could think of

1.0
Jun 15, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great products that help scientific researchers

Cons

The enterprise comms dept is awful. A toxic environment marked by instability and burnout. Long‑time employees are pushed out, new hires leave, and the culture is defined by fear rather than collaboration. The core issue is the leadership. Limited enterprise‑level experience and a lack of emotional intelligence have created a culture of micro-managing, reactive decisions, and psychological insecurity. Instead of providing clarity and strategic leadership, the leader fuels confusion, distrust, and exhaustion. The result is a dysfunctional department where morale is low, workloads are unsustainable, and employees feel unsafe speaking up.

8
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All