Toxic work environment - Manager ANDRUS Employee Review

1.0
Apr 19, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Working with certain staff that understand the mission The relationships made along the way The culture before the current CEO

Cons

The current CEO does not know how to lead the organization. He has made so many changes for the worse in the past few years. The White Plains Clinic was sunsetted causing for clinicians to be relocated/let go. Census for the residential program was decreased significantly - in turn decreasing the number of children that the organization is able to serve. The census was decreased because the organization did not have enough staff to take care of the children. There is not enough staff to take care of the children because the leadership team does not know how to be leaders and guide their staff in the right direction to provide exceptional services. Staff do not feel valued. I’ve attended a staff party at the President’s house where the CEO refused staff to use the bathroom onsite. The leaders of the organization also don’t understand or recognize what needs to be done to ensure retention. I’ve worked here for many years and the work environment has changed drastically. Direct care staff use to be able to lean on each other as a team, depend on each other and be on the same page when taking care of the children within the cottages. They would feel comfortable within their cottages and have a strong sense of team. There were regular trainings provided to us to ensure that Andrus is providing the best care to the children. Within the past few years with the new CEO this has all dissipated. All of the staff who had these skills have all left. The new staff who are being hired are not being provided with the skill set to handle the children within residence. The CEO is concentrating on the wrong things. He is working on creating a data dashboard for all leadership staff, not sure how far or how successful that will be as none of the leadership staff are using it to influence the work that they do. Staff do not feel connected to the CEO or the Chiefs. Leadership have left a bad taste with middle and lower-level staff and even the clients we serve!! The clinical leadership has not been consistent. The Chief Clinical Officer was recently terminated, with no explanation. The Chief Development Officer who raised less money than she was even paid, and did away with the fundraising events for Andrus is gone. There is no fundraising team. The Chief Human Resources Officer’s solution has been to fire people, they do not advocate for people to get raises, rather they keep piling on work to the staff who are already there overworked, and physically and mentally drained. On a weekly basis the staff are leaving or being terminated. The turnover rates and information that are being shared with the board are being manipulated to push the CEO’s agenda forward. It’s only a matter of time before the Board looks into the inner workings of the CEO, and what is really occurring. All of his executive admin team have left his office. The Chief Program Officer, as the longest standing leader at Andrus is not speaking up and making the right decisions for the children and families in Andrus’ care. The organization is falling apart from all ends, and no one is doing anything to make it whole. I wouldn’t be surprised if the CEO is working on his exit plan. He’s using company dollars to pay for his personal expenses. The board needs to look into what the money is being spent on. The organization pays for his membership to a country club for him and his family to attend and every penny is being charged to Andrus. The board needs to ask the right questions and look into the books. The facilities staff have also worked with contractors to reconfigure the President’s House to add a third floor room and bathroom for their babysitter, spending hundreds of thousands of dollars. One of the main reasons the Facilities Director left. The cottages are filthy, the leadership team brought staff in to clean the cottages because of how dirty and disgusting they are. Why is money not being spent on the facility for the children we are taking care of? Rather it’s being funneled into the pockets of the CEO. Staff are denied bonuses, while the CEO is receiving 5 figure bonuses. When you speak up about concerns, leaders are not willing to hear you, but rather blacklist you and make your life at work miserable until they either fire you by doing away with your position, wrongfully terminating you, or pushing staff to leave because they refuse to promote staff who are doing their jobs or giving them raises. The organization is experiencing a crisis of leadership and fiscal responsibility. I can’t wait to be out of this place. It’s falling apart all around me.

avatar
ANDRUS Response
2y
Your feedback is important as it helps us recognize areas where we need to continue to improve. Our commitment is to ensure Andrus remains a place where both staff and the clients we serve feel valued and supported. We want you to stay and work with us to make improvements and would welcome the opportunity to discuss these issues further.

Explore other reviews about ANDRUS

5.0
Oct 26, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Leaders are passionate and committed to the growth of individuals who serve our youth. Staff is caring and trained along the way to build on their skill set

Cons

Hard to teach staff that trauma work requires care and compassion sometimes.

1
1.0
May 21, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great health insurance, beautiful campus, wildlife, diversity.

Cons

During my time at this agency, I see a consistent disconnect between leadership decisions and the organization’s stated core values. This contradiction creates confusion and instability for staff, and it made mistakes more likely simply because the environment lacked clarity and support. Communication from upper leadership is often vague or inconsistent. While the agency is focused on addressing fiscal challenges, the approach has included undermining the very staff hired to improve fiscal integrity. This contradiction has been difficult to understand and has contributed to a sense of disorganization. The agency upholds the Sanctuary trauma‑informed model, yet there has been little acknowledgment of the collective disturbance and parallel processes that naturally arise during times of organizational stress. Optics often appear to be prioritized over genuine trauma‑informed practice, and it is discouraging to see individuals with no clinical background making decisions that directly affect the agency’s integrity and the well‑being of both staff and clients. Ethical and moral practices are meant to be modeled from the top. Instead, upper leadership has made decisions about the treatment of families and children without adequate regard for their clinical needs. Morality in a mental health setting includes supporting the staff who show up every day, manage crises, demonstrate care and concern for the children, and understand that good treatment requires flexibility and decisions rooted in the best clinical interests of the people served. These patterns have eroded morale and moved the organization further from its mission. Prospective employees may want to explore other opportunities where staff are valued and supported in the work they do.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All