The technical team I interacted with was knowledgeable, professional, and the conversations were engaging. The company's mission is compelling, and I was genuinely excited about the role and the potential to contribute.
The Challenges & Reasons for Low Rating:
Incomplete & Drip-Fed Information: The initial offer was missing critical financial details, specifically the bonus scheme, which constitutes a significant part of the compensation. This crucial information was only provided weeks after the initial offer, which prevented me from making a fully informed decision in a timely manner.
Lack of Clear Communication & Rigidity: There was a fundamental disconnect in communication at the final stage. From my perspective, expressing acceptance while asking for final clarifications on standard contract terms (like probation details) was a step towards finalizing the agreement. However, the HR team interpreted this as a rejection or a new negotiation, not as a final acceptance. This rigidity and lack of flexibility were surprising for a senior-level role.
Negative Final Interaction: The final call felt like a one-sided decision to withdraw the offer, framed around me being a "high risk" because I asked questions. Seeking clarity on long-term integration was seen as a lack of commitment rather than as a sign of serious intent and planning.
Wasted Time and Effort: I had invested significant time in research and preparation, including an on-site visit. The sudden end of the process due to this communication breakdown felt like a waste of my time and the company's resources.
Advice to Management:
I would recommend providing a complete and transparent compensation package from the outset. Furthermore, training the recruitment team to handle final-stage clarifications with more flexibility and dialogue, rather than seeing them as a threat, would greatly improve the candidate experience and help secure top talent.
Advice to Future Candidates:
Insist on receiving the complete compensation details (base salary, bonus, all benefits) in writing before you even consider an offer.
Be extremely clear and unambiguous in your communication. Avoid any language like "I accept, but..." as it can be misinterpreted. State your acceptance clearly first, then ask questions separately.
Be prepared for a process that may lack flexibility in the final stages.
A severe communication breakdown occurred at the final stage. I had communicated my acceptance of the offer and was seeking minor clarifications, but the company misinterpreted this as a continued negotiation and unilaterally withdrew the position.
I applied online. The process took 6 weeks. I interviewed at IEE (Luxembourg) (Bissen) in Aug 2025
Interview
Round 1: 2 Engineers and 1 HR. Standard introductions and background of company followed by questions regarding my background and motivations. Approx. 1 hour.
Told to wait 2 weeks for repsonse. Response came sooner (2 days); scheduled on-site round 2 interview.
Round 2: 3 engineers and 1 HR. Repeat of introductions and more details regarding company and scope of project. Technical questions and some questions about my suitability for the position.
Told to wait 2 weeks for decision. Offer came a few days later.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
How much MATLAB and Python experience do you have?
I applied in-person. The process took 4 months. I interviewed at IEE (Luxembourg) (Luxembourg) in Dec 2023
Interview
2 interview one in person The other on site, with showing around. HR was friendly but the other person that I think was chief of something not really friendly. No technical questions just like YouTube interviews.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
What is your weakness? how much salary do you expect? Do you have any other interview? Why you came to Luxembourg?