Glassdoor users rated their interview experience at FlightSafety International as 100% positive with a difficulty rating score of 3 out of 5 (where 5 is the highest level of difficulty). Candidates interviewing for Manager and Advertising Manager rated their interviews as the hardest, whereas interviews for Manager and Advertising Manager roles were rated as the easiest.
The hiring process at FlightSafety International takes an average of 5 days when considering 2 user submitted interviews across all job titles. Candidates applying for Manager had the quickest hiring process (on average 5 days), whereas Manager roles had the slowest hiring process (on average 5 days).
I interviewed at FlightSafety International (Broken Arrow, OK)
Interview
In the beginning everyone was very friendly and welcoming with the process going by quickly but after the group panel interview things got stagnant. The interview process literally lasted 2 months before they went with another person and it seems they were delaying the process to interview other people and find a better candidate. Although I appreciate their diligence, I find that disrespectful to other people’s’ time and other prospects to keep everyone else waiting in limbo. Companies should either know they want the candidate or move on, but not string along candidates if they are continuing to interview others especially if those waiting are really interested in the chance. Seemed like a great opportunity at a great location, but the way the process progressed into a waiting 2 months cat and mouse game turned out to be disappointing. Really appreciate the hiring manager communicating at the midpoint of those 2 months why things were being delayed but things went quiet after that and I had to reach out multiple times on the progress after that call. Hope they can improve their hiring process because it’s a good company with good employees.
I applied online. I interviewed at FlightSafety International (Columbus, OH) in Mar 2026
Interview
I interviewed for a Lead Data Engineer role and went through multiple rounds with technical and leadership interviewers. The discussions focused on data engineering architecture, data quality frameworks, and governance practices, which align closely with my current role as a data quality engineering specialist.
After completing the interview process, the feedback provided was that I “lacked depth in the required skills,” which was unexpected given that the topics discussed are part of my current specialization. Within a few days of receiving this feedback, the company posted a new role for a Lead Data Quality Analyst with requirements very similar to the experience outlined in my resume and discussed during interviews. The process left the impression that the role expectations may not have been clearly defined before interviewing candidates.
I applied online. I interviewed at FlightSafety International
Interview
There was not an opportunity for me to ask questions during the interview or at the end of the interview because of the number of questions I was asked during the panel interview. The interview felt rushed.