Interesting work in the security field - Threat Intelligence Analyst SecurityScorecard Employee Review

5.0
May 25, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Work is closely related to real cybersecurity threats which makes the role engaging. Team members are experienced and willing to share knowledge.

Cons

Priorities can sometimes shift quickly.

avatar
SecurityScorecard Response
1w
Thank you for sharing your perspective and for the vital work you do to keep our customers safe on the Threat Intel team. We value your feedback regarding shifting priorities. We operate in a fast-moving space where priorities can evolve quickly, and we are always looking at ways we can improve our processes. Our Head of L&D is currently developing new AI-driven workshops, and I would highly recommend you keep an eye out for that! Feedback like yours is how we continue to lead the field. Thank you for being part of our mission.

Explore other reviews about SecurityScorecard

5.0
May 31, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Opportunity to interact with major companies and learn cybersecurity solutions. Sales training is helpful.

Cons

Sales targets can be demanding during some quarters.

2.0
Jun 6, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

SecurityScorecard has smart, hardworking people, and there are real opportunities to take on meaningful work quickly. If you are someone who can operate independently, solve ambiguous problems, and move fast, you can have a lot of impact here. There are also pockets of strong cross-functional collaboration, especially among employees who are genuinely trying to keep the business moving despite constant change.

Cons

The biggest issue is leadership instability and inconsistent operating discipline. Priorities change quickly, ownership is often unclear, and too much critical work depends on a small number of people rather than durable processes or properly staffed teams. There is a pattern of asking employees to absorb more scope without the resources, authority, or support required to execute sustainably. Decision-making can feel reactive instead of strategic. Different teams may push overlapping initiatives without clear alignment, which creates confusion, duplicated work, and unnecessary political friction. There is also a tendency to reward urgency over planning, which leads to burnout and makes it difficult to build systems that last. Communication from leadership often feels disconnected from the reality of day-to-day execution. The company talks about transformation and innovation, but the internal operating model does not always support that ambition.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All