So much wasted potential - Software Engineer Passare Employee Review

1.0
Feb 3, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Office is in good location

Cons

Management doesn't have the talent to lead this startup to success. Passare would benefit greatly if a visionary was leading the company. Compensation is the lowest I have seen in the Bay Area. This would be ok if the equity or benefits were good but unfortunately this is not true for this company. Equity for the people that contributed the most to building the company was the lowest. Benefits are paid for in full for employees but the plan provided is not as good as other companies in the area. PTO is pretty low at 2 weeks a year. No 401k. Joining Passare as an software engineer means you take all the risk and long hours common with startups without the benefits of a good salary, fun atmosphere and equity in the company you are building. If you are considering a position at this company I would advise looking elsewhere. There are so many other startups out there that would value your effort and devotion more than Passare.

Explore other reviews about Passare

1.0
Feb 28, 2015
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The old office was conveniently located, though like the team, the space and office culture was uninspired.

Cons

The hire-on "founders" had no domain experience, or any startup or product experience to speak of. C-level management generally dropped by the office before noon, yawned, and left by 2pm. VP's contributed nothing and mostly got in the way. Directors worked themselves into rabbit holes. The meeting culture was atrocious with full-day meetings to schedule future meetings being the norm. Effectively 100% of the product, engineering, and design was off-shored, and in-office individuals consisted mainly of over-inflated titles. All interactions with the individual contributors was done sight-unseen, effectively circumventing any opportunity to build relationships with the people we worked with. No respect or recognition was ever given to the team. Compensation at the individual contributor level were terrible, and benefits and equity are very poor (2 weeks PTO and stock option allocations in the hundreds). Ironically no retirement benefits were available. Management was over compensated and generally hired unqualified buddies to fill senior VP roles and above.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All