Pros
Hyperverge "was" a young team, lots of great characters and it "was" fun to work at. Culturally the org "was" tremendous to work at. Hyperverge "had" always tried to bring in sustainability in their processes and approach.
Cons
Please read my pros section, look for words with "". All the good things were from the past. Overall the last 6-8 months, the org is trying to scale massively, but without a sustainable plan or goal. Things change overnight, and communication has become siloued. Overtime, people internally have started hating a lot of processes, it appears a lot of people are trying to prove personal agendas rather trying to solve problems together. Come on, growth does not mean stamping others. In short, i personally feel Hyperverge is trying to fit a "lamborgini" engine into an outdated "Nano". You know how the performance can be. It may sound crazy, but you know it's always gonna fire out in sometime, you just have to wait, but your wait does not just affect the org, but people who work for it. Unsure, where all the ideas are coming from, not validated, is it always about trial and error??? Does a polished answer solve all the problems of your own teams? Does a polished statement about caring your employees really mean the care is real? What are you trying to grow if the growth is not sustainable and its not got a clear path ahead?