employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Associated Press

Is this your company?

Over the last few years AP has deteriorated from a place most reporters want to work to a place most want to get out of. - Anonymous employee Associated Press Employee Review

1.0
Nov 22, 2013
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The so-called prestige to at AP looks good on your resume. Plus, you'll work so hard for a company that is now stretched so thin, you'll especially love your next job.

Cons

It's frankly now just a horrible place to work. Work loads are excessive, the company is so broke its only strategy seems to be to put more pressure on its reporters. Reporters have been leaving the company in droves for the last couple of years, with few if any replacements. Meanwhile, according to the president of the union that represents AP reporters, three recent firings "appear to be aimed at driving fear into the hearts of reporters." And, if that's not enough, the current contract talks are probably the nastiest they've ever been, with staffers facing a virtual pay cut with a tiny salary increase, but with huge increases in health care payments.

Explore other reviews about Associated Press

5.0
May 6, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Work was easy and supervisors were helpful

Cons

It can get very busy during peak times.

1.0
Dec 21, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

You get to work with lovely people, some of which are brilliant.

Cons

This is an organization where relationships often matter more than results. Advancement tends to favor visibility and proximity over impact, which can make the path forward feel less about contribution and more about navigation. HR and People functions appear heavily resourced on paper, yet those teams are frequently stretched thin, creating the impression of care without the corresponding capacity to deliver it meaningfully. Each year brings another cycle of organizational reshuffling that can feel at odds with the stated focus on employee experience and development. Learning and development exists, but its purpose is sometimes unclear, as day-to-day work life has grown more complicated rather than more supported compared to prior years. There is a noticeable gap between the language used around innovation and data driven decision making and the organization’s appetite for actual change. The culture often speaks in aspirational terms while operating in familiar patterns. For employees who value transparency, consistency, and progress over rhetoric, this can be frustrating. The result is a workplace that talks about transformation but remains largely committed to the status quo.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All