Kraken Digital Asset Exchange San Francisco Office | Glassdoor

Kraken Digital Asset Exchange San Francisco, CA (US)

Kraken Digital Asset Exchange San Francisco, CA (US) Reviews

  • Helpful (2)

    "Amazing place to work"

    StarStarStarStarStar
    • Work/Life Balance
    • Culture & Values
    • Career Opportunities
    • Comp & Benefits
    • Senior Management
    Current Employee - Head of Growth in San Francisco, CA (US)
    Current Employee - Head of Growth in San Francisco, CA (US)
    Recommends
    Positive Outlook
    Approves of CEO

    I have been working at Kraken Digital Asset Exchange full-time (Less than a year)

    Pros

    Brilliant people, exciting industry. Everyone is super friendly and intellectually rigorous, which I love!

    Cons

    No cons so far! Some of my team is distributed, so make sure you're comfortable with working with people remotely.

    Advice to Management

    Keep doing what you are doing - this is a phenomenal company with an amazing culture.

See All Reviews

Kraken Digital Asset Exchange San Francisco, CA (US) Photos

Kraken Digital Asset Exchange photo of: Do you know what HODL means? :)
Kraken Digital Asset Exchange photo of: good area of HQ for preparing Kraken merchandise or having a meeting
Kraken Digital Asset Exchange photo of: Jesse (Kraken CEO) getting some work done at HQ
Kraken Digital Asset Exchange photo of: office was designed to feel like a home

Kraken Digital Asset Exchange San Francisco, CA (US) Jobs

Kraken Digital Asset Exchange San Francisco, CA (US) Salaries

Salaries in $ (USD)
Average
Min
Max
About $137k - $172k
$137k
$172k
About $137k - $172k
$137k
$172k
1 employee salary or estimate
About $24 - $28
$24
$28
About $24 - $28
$24
$28
1 employee salary or estimate
About $78k - $92k
$78k
$92k
About $78k - $92k
$78k
$92k

Kraken Digital Asset Exchange San Francisco, CA (US) Interviews

Experience

Experience
50%
25%
25%

Getting an Interview

Getting an Interview
88%
12%

Difficulty

2.9
Average

Difficulty

Hard
Average
Easy
  1. Helpful (5)  

    Frontend Developer Interview

    Anonymous Interview Candidate in San Francisco, CA (US)
    No Offer
    Negative Experience
    Average Interview

    Application

    I applied online. The process took 4+ weeks. I interviewed at Kraken Digital Asset Exchange (San Francisco, CA (US)) in May 2019.

    Interview

    I just had 5 stages of interviews with Kraken (during a period of a bit over 1 month).

    - 1st stage - video chat with a technical recruiter. He basically talked about my experience, about crypto, etc. I found the first stage a bit confusing, because he clearly didn't have a proper plan in place. First he asked me the difference between a bit and a byte... er... what?... then, he was prepared to ask me a few PHP questions, but I stopped him right there and said: "You may ask me some PHP questions, but I've never done any PHP ever, so I won't be able to answer... The recruiter, said that's fine. Absolutely terrible. Why ask those questions to a React developer? I ended the interview, thinking this was a complete amateur process, since the questions were all over the place.

    - 2nd stage - technical interview - mainly an hour with just technical questions

    - 3rd stage - technical challenge - without going into much detail, and not exposing, at all, what they ask, there's a section regarding the API that mentions something like we have the choice of writing the API server, create a fake API, mock it, use an external service, etc...

    As a candidate applying for a frontend position, this tells me that the relevant part is, of course, the frontend application - the fact that we could mock it, or even use an EXTERNAL service, indicates that you are NOT responsible for that API. Either way, I chose to do it myself, using Node.JS.

    4th stage - review technical challenge. Did a run-through of my implementation. Answered all of their questions. One of the developers asked me why I didn't embed the styles (I was using Sass). I said that I chose to use a BEM approach, that, of course, promotes re-usability, etc. The other developer commended me on that choice.

    I passed all of these 4 stages.

    5th stage - Interview with the VP of Technology and another senior dev. The senior dev, asked me a few more questions regarding React, which I answered pretty easily. The VP of Technology was simply amazing, excellent attitude and overall world-class - asked more high level questions. The senior developer, after 40 mins, and with just 5 mins to go, made a criticism regarding my BACKEND implementation, that I totally acknowledged (not a big deal - and something that would have been covered if I were applying for a backend position)

    In the end, the recruiter sent me an email, stating I was rejected for 2 reasons:

    - "the current hire on the team will need more in depth understanding of the advanced features of Sass" - I honestly think that they simply didn't know what BEM was. Search "What is BEM and why you should use it".

    - Security concern on the backend - my focus was on the frontend (why did I pass to the 5th stage, if I had already supposedly passed the review / evaluation of my technical assignment? What if I had chosen to just mock the API? I think that would have been a much better choice, apparently.). What if I had chosen to use an external service? How would you evaluate an external service? It's important that you understand that the phrasing is misleading... and senior developer, why waste everyone's time, if, in the end, you already had in mind that the security concern you pointed out, would be enough to get me rejected?

    The rejection came via a standard e-mail, with those 2 points, and that was it. I Spent more than 1 month, took time away from holidays, and the outcome was this.

    Ironically enough, I spotted a security related concern in the kraken.com website, which I shared with the recruiter: details + steps to fix it. He never replied back, which I thought was a big lack of professionalism. Absolutely terrible.

    No Kraken, I won't apply back again if I see an opportunity that sparks my interest - what you did was simply waste my time.
    I honestly feel it was an unfair outcome.

    That was my experience.

    TL;DR: I went to the 5th stage... then: "you know that little something that's only relevant to something you did on the 3rd stage, a good few weeks ago? Yeah... we didn't like that, sorry".

    Interview Questions

    • difference between bit and byte   1 Answer
See All Interviews