Voodoo Interview Questions

The process was mismanaged and confusing. Different departments completely lost in their internal processes. The actual interview with other studio directors, with VPs and managers were fine. But everything leading up to those was confusing. There were over 10 interviews overall (which is pretty insane) only to be told that you are lacking motivation. If motivation to do 10 interviews and 3 different test cases is not enough then im not sure what is. As i have learned later the rejection was mainly based on Voodoo slashing budgets massively. But then it was disrespectful and a waste of my time to keep the interview process going for so long.

Un test à accomplir : Maki Test : Questions excel, questions de réflexion, questions anglais. Un premier échange téléphonique avec Talent Acquisition Un premier entretien de 30 min avec la même personne. Un case test à compléter : étude de cas et test excel Un deuxième entretien avec les responsables du service. Tout s'est bien passé jusqu'au dernier entretien où l'une des personnes qui m'ont interviewé m'a clairement manqué de respect. En effet, On vous laisse même pas pas finir votre phrase et votre raisonnement.. des interruptions à chaque fois où je prends la parole. La personne en question, avait l'air précipité et voulait juste finir l'entretien.. on ne vous regarde même pas qu'on vous répondez aux questions.. à plusieurs reprises, la personne était sur son téléphone.. Enfin je trouve que tout ça est irrespectueux envers le candidat qui a pris son temps à préparer et venir pour passer l'entretien. On vous dit clairement, qu'ils cherchent des personnes qui doivent être opérationnel dès le premier jour et que leurs attentes sont beaucoup plus hautes par rapport à d'autres structures. En demandant des avis à des anciens salariés qui ont du quitté, j'ai vite compris la culture de la société et le style de management à l'américaine ! Je vous invite à lire les avis ici et aussi demander l'avis d'ancien salarié sur Linkedin.

Made it to the 2nd interview, and while I didn't get the position I enjoyed the process in general as well as the quick response in all phases (mostly waited days and not weeks/months for replies). Had a very informal introductory interview, followed by a test which I had a week to complete. Along with the test was a short IQ test. Both tests were challenging but interesting. The (for me) final interview was also a positive experience, with 3 key people asking questions relating to the test and the role. It felt like the process was solid in order to find the right person for the position.

3 steps: HR, Collaborator & Case Study. HR was overall nice but more interested in finding a candidate based to fill the number of applicants rather than finding a skilled talented creative.

Me apunté al proceso de selección via Linkedin. Recibí un mail de confirmación y nos podremos en contacto contigo. Al cabo de un día recibí un mail para hacer unos test psicotécnicos con el fin de ir avanzando en el proceso. Sin haber contactado conmigo la gente de rrhh o el anunciante del proceso. 3 test, nivel inglés, cálculo y comprensión, muchas preguntas para poco tiempo, por lo que o corres y te arriesgas a fallar, o vas lento y no contestas todo. No volví a saber de ellos, ni un mísero " gracias por tu esfuerzo y tiempo, pero no encajas..."

This was in July 2022 It started with an interview with the Talent Acquisition Rep and the team lead. Questions were about my previous work experience and general career stuff. Then I was sent a test to finish in a week. After that I had an interview with 2 members of the team. They asked questions about the test and a small algorithm test as well. Finally I had an interview with the head of publishing, mostly to see if I would be a good fit. In the end, they said they froze hiring and although I got positive feedback, they wouldn't be moving forward at the time.

I'm very satisfied with the recruitment process. I felt like a professional talking with the professionals. Respectful information exchange and flawless guidance by recruiting team. I would recommend it to each of my colleagues.

Very fast and straightforward process. A general chat first, good summary about the work culture, benefits and the projects overview. Then the technical test (which is quite big and consists of 2 tasks, but it's not something unreasonable. You can probably evaluate how much time you'd need to spend on that and decide if it's worth it). Another follow up interview after the test to ask more about the specifics and after that only a few things to clarify with HR and the manager. The whole process took about 2 weeks in my case, which is probably the fastest I've ever experienced.