I applied through a recruiter. The process took 2 months. I interviewed at Charlie Health in Mar 2021
Interview
Oof. This was one of the worst interview experiences I've ever had. All in all, took over two months to go through their process due to multiple lulls on their side before finally receiving a written offer that I had to accept by the end of the day. I received a tentative verbal offer in early March while they were checking my references. All of my references left great feedback and we moved towards a verbal offer. I wanted to negotiate a starting bonus and the recruiter let me know that he would try his best. A week passed (first red flag) before the recruiter let me know that they actually decided to reduce the offer by 15K (second red flag). The VP of Engineering called me and told me how lucky I was that he was contacting me since I'd never get a similar opportunity to talk to an exec in Big Tech (third red flag; I had already worked in Big Tech before and was recruiting specifically with start-ups). After this conversation, I was still interested to see where the process would go. Another week passed (fourth red flag) before I finally got the written offer and was told that I had to sign by the end of the day (fifth red flag). All in all, would not recommend anyone to go through this long and terrible process!!
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
First round = recruiter Second round = take home full-stack assessment Onsite = code review of take home, product manager conversation and engineering manager interview.
Recruiter screen → take-home assignment → in-person onsite → reference check → verbal offer
The process itself was straightforward up until the final stage. After receiving a verbal offer, I was informed roughly a week later that it had been rescinded; apparently without prior sign-off from the CTO. It left a poor impression: a verbal offer shouldn't be extended before internal alignment is confirmed at the executive level.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
describe a time you dealt with a technical bug, and how you solved it
I applied through a recruiter. The process took 1 week. I interviewed at Charlie Health
Interview
Codesignal > System Design + 2 Behaviorals.
I will say the pay for Charlie Health is incredibly low, ranging it seems from 140k - 170k for mid level in NYC. The recruiter and I seemed out of alignment for pay, which ultimately led to my rejection. They want engineers in office in NYC 4 days a week and only offer food twice a week (Tuesday and Thursday). Seems that this company is skimping on a lot. All in all, they want to hire top talent, cannot meet the bands required for top talent, and reject overqualified candidates (to be honest, they probably knew I was going to reject, so they rejected first). The interview process is exceptionally easy, which proves that the engineering talent is mid, yet they are trying to hire talented engineers. Good luck
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
System Design Question was about a feature at Charlie Health, following no normal System Design format. Engineers are pretty subpar here
I applied through a recruiter. The process took 3 weeks. I interviewed at Charlie Health in Jul 2025
Interview
They seem messy. Recruiter ghosted me mid process lol. After 3 rounds of interviews spanning a several weeks, it's pretty unprofessional that they can't even send a proper rejection email.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Interview feels standard for SWEs: recruiter phone screen -> 90 min code signal -> 2ish hours onsite (systems design + 2 behaviorals)