Title: Interview Process Did Not Allow Meaningful Evaluation of Experience I recently participated in the interview process for a senior architecture role at Capco. While the recruiter and coordination process were professional, the overall interview experience was disappointing. I was looking forward to discussing my background, technical expertise, and nearly 20 years of experience in data, cloud, and enterprise architecture. However, the discussion with the hiring manager/interviewer concluded in approximately 10 minutes, which did not provide sufficient opportunity to meaningfully explore my experience, leadership capabilities, or technical qualifications. Based on the limited interaction, I felt the interview process did not allow for a comprehensive assessment of my skills or potential fit for the role. As a result, I decided to pursue another opportunity where the interview process involved more in-depth discussions and a thorough evaluation of candidates. Pros: * Professional recruiter and interview coordination * Efficient scheduling process * Positive initial communication Cons: * Very brief technical discussion * Limited opportunity to demonstrate experience and expertise * Interview process did not appear structured for evaluating senior-level candidates comprehensively Advice to Management: For senior and leadership-level roles, consider allowing sufficient time for candidates to discuss their experience, architectural thinking, leadership approach, and business impact. A more comprehensive conversation would likely lead to a better evaluation experience for both candidates and interviewers.

The interview process was a bit challenge but very well structured. I very much enjoyed the case study portion of the interview as I was able to (albeit with limited time) showcase the experience I've amassed over the years. Talk through methodically how I would tackle such issue.