Compare Toronto Star vs National Post BETA

See how National Post vs. Toronto Star compare on employee ratings, job openings, CEO approval, business outlook and more.

Employee Ratings

Overall Rating
(full-time and part-time employees only)
3.0
(based on 70 reviews)
2.9
(based on 9 reviews)
Career Opportunities
2.3
2.7
Compensation & Benefits
3.5
2.1
Work-life balance
3.4
3.0
Senior Management
2.4
2.7
Culture & Values
2.9
2.9
CEO Approval
Toronto Star Ceo John D. Cruickshank
51%John D. Cruickshank
National Post Ceo Sheldon Sawchuk
N/ASheldon Sawchuk
% Recommend to a friend
35%
59%
Positive Business Outlook
3%
N/A

Salaries

Salaries for similar jobs
Designer2 Salaries
CA$63,542/yr
Ontario2 Salaries
CA$54,171/yr
Analyst3 Salaries
CA$60,011/yr
Reporter2 Salaries
CA$61,999/yr
Ontario1 Salaries
CA$14/hr
Photo Retoucher1 Salaries
CA$44,774/yr

What Employees Say

Pros
"Good location"(in 5 reviews)
"Great benefits"(in 4 reviews)
There are no reviews matching this company.
Cons
"Middle management"(in 3 reviews)
"Journalism"(in 3 reviews)
Featured Review
"Web Developer"Mar 14, 2019

Current Employee - Web Developer

I have been working at Toronto Star full-time for more than a year

Pros

Freedom, Flexibility, Evolving Business, Good Location

Cons

Hard environment when there is constantly layoffs as the newspaper industry isn't in the best of times.

Current Employee - Anonymous Employee

I have been working at National Post full-time for more than a year

Pros

The Post, because it isn't unionized, pays like garbage compared to its chief competitors at the Star and the Globe. It also does have some opinion columnists who are generally regarded to be... completely noxious, but that's part of its role as a paper with a centre-right editorial stance. However, it's also in many ways far more progressive than its competitors. The Globe and Star are run by egomaniac men, particularly the Globe where women are basically barred from senior ranks: meanwhile, the Post is helmed almost completely by women in the senior roles and there's lots of opportunity for everyone to advance. For whatever reason, the toxic sexism that runs through the media industry is felt a lot less here, and the paper deserves a ton of credit for that. Writers also have more flexibility, as editors are open to weird stories or things that fall outside the margins. Editors can jump on and do stories or other work if they're interested. The poor financial position of the paper's parent company means its understaffed, which stinks, but which also means there is room to try your hand at new things and that is great for experience. The staff are all smart and funny and it's one of the most good natured and loving workplace environments you could ask for, even conflicts are addressed in a civil manner.

Cons

As stated above, the pay is garbage compared to most competitors. You're looking at 20k less in many cases compared to equivalent positions at other papers. The fact that it's understaffed means... there are times where you'll be worked to death, and that can be emotionally and physically unhealthy. The financial position of the parent company, Postmedia, is also a big concern since it means the whole operation could go under any time in the next couple of years, or at the very least that severe layoffs are in play --- although the company recently refinanced some of their debt to ease the burden.

Advice to Management

The Post's management is really great and inspiring since it's almost all women at a major Canadian media company. There are still diversity problems as the newsroom is overwhelmingly white, but... that's something some managers have acknowledged publicly. There isn't much they can do about the garbage pay, because the company has no money. Otherwise, like all journalism outlets, it's helpful if they watch their staff and pull them back from the cliff of working themselves to death.

Job Postings