Compare Maple Leaf Foods vs Gallo Worldwide BETA

See how Gallo Worldwide vs. Maple Leaf Foods compare on employee ratings, job openings, CEO approval, business outlook and more.
Maple Leaf Foods company icon

Maple Leaf Foods

Gallo Worldwide

Employee Ratings

Overall Rating
(full-time and part-time employees only)
Overall Rating
(full-time and part-time employees only)
3.2
(based on 408 reviews)
Overall Rating
(full-time and part-time employees only)
3.4
(based on 3 reviews)
Career Opportunities
Career Opportunities
3.0
Career Opportunities
2.8
Compensation & Benefits
Compensation & Benefits
3.3
Compensation & Benefits
2.9
Work-life balance
Work-life balance
3.0
Work-life balance
3.1
Senior Management
Senior Management
2.8
Senior Management
2.4
Culture & Values
Culture & Values
3.1
Culture & Values
1.8
CEO Approval
CEO Approval
Maple Leaf Foods Ceo Michael H. McCain
76%
76%Michael H. McCain
CEO Approval
Gallo Worldwide placeholder CEO image
N/A0 Ratings
% Recommend to a friend
% Recommend to a friend
60%
% Recommend to a friend
19%
Positive Business Outlook
Positive Business Outlook
52%
Positive Business Outlook
N/A

Salaries

Salaries for similar jobs
Salaries for similar jobs
Production Supervisor16 Salaries
CA$65,559/yr
Financial Analyst10 Salaries
CA$56,713/yr
Sanitation10 Salaries
CA$15/hr
There are no salaries matching this company.

What Employees Say

Pros
Pros
"Great people"(in 23 reviews)
"Work environment"(in 21 reviews)
There are no reviews matching this company.
Cons
Cons
"Work life balance"(in 27 reviews)
"Long hours"(in 14 reviews)
Featured Review

Former Employee - Anonymous Employee

I worked at Maple Leaf Foods full-time

Pros

Friendly, flexible, great working conditions

Cons

Nothing to complain about in my experience

I worked at Gallo Worldwide

Pros

Approachable and sensitive top management Leading edge in its markets/categories Autonomy Challenging environment for people with an entrepreneurial mindset

Cons

Its not the place for who want to grow fast in its career Exaggerated internal politics and lack of meritocracy Low investment in people development

Job Postings