[{"employerId":354,"interestEmployerId":1737,"shortName":"Oracle","reviewCount":24878,"reviewRating":3.49,"photoLogoUrl":"sqls/1737/oracle-squarelogo-1570718316042.png","formattedReviewCount":"24,878","currentSectionUrl":"/Compare/Oracle-Company-Comparisons-E1737.htm","reviewsUrl":"/Reviews/Oracle-Reviews-E1737.htm","siteSection":"COMPARE","companyComparisonUrl":"/Compare/IBM-vs-Oracle-EI_IE354-E1737.htm"},{"employerId":354,"interestEmployerId":2763,"shortName":"Deloitte","reviewCount":34310,"reviewRating":3.86,"photoLogoUrl":"sqls/2763/deloitte-squarelogo-1481880537463.png","formattedReviewCount":"34,310","currentSectionUrl":"/Compare/Deloitte-Company-Comparisons-E2763.htm","reviewsUrl":"/Reviews/Deloitte-Reviews-E2763.htm","siteSection":"COMPARE","companyComparisonUrl":"/Compare/IBM-vs-Deloitte-EI_IE354-E2763.htm"},{"employerId":354,"interestEmployerId":6036,"shortName":"Amazon","reviewCount":38256,"reviewRating":3.85,"photoLogoUrl":"sqls/6036/amazon-squarelogo-1552847650117.png","formattedReviewCount":"38,256","currentSectionUrl":"/Compare/Amazon-Company-Comparisons-E6036.htm","reviewsUrl":"/Reviews/Amazon-Reviews-E6036.htm","siteSection":"COMPARE","companyComparisonUrl":"/Compare/IBM-vs-Amazon-EI_IE354-E6036.htm"},{"employerId":354,"interestEmployerId":1138,"shortName":"Apple","reviewCount":16265,"reviewRating":3.96,"photoLogoUrl":"sqls/1138/apple-squarelogo-1485292862952.png","formattedReviewCount":"16,265","currentSectionUrl":"/Compare/Apple-Company-Comparisons-E1138.htm","reviewsUrl":"/Reviews/Apple-Reviews-E1138.htm","siteSection":"COMPARE","companyComparisonUrl":"/Compare/IBM-vs-Apple-EI_IE354-E1138.htm"},{"employerId":354,"interestEmployerId":1425,"shortName":"Cisco Systems","reviewCount":17993,"reviewRating":4.13,"photoLogoUrl":"sqls/1425/cisco-systems-squarelogo-1479855777953.png","formattedReviewCount":"17,993","currentSectionUrl":"/Compare/Cisco-Systems-Company-Comparisons-E1425.htm","reviewsUrl":"/Reviews/Cisco-Systems-Reviews-E1425.htm","siteSection":"COMPARE","companyComparisonUrl":"/Compare/IBM-vs-Cisco-Systems-EI_IE354-E1425.htm"},{"employerId":354,"interestEmployerId":4138,"shortName":"Accenture","reviewCount":52384,"reviewRating":3.83,"photoLogoUrl":"sqls/4138/accenture-squarelogo-1561558417537.png","formattedReviewCount":"52,384","currentSectionUrl":"/Compare/Accenture-Company-Comparisons-E4138.htm","reviewsUrl":"/Reviews/Accenture-Reviews-E4138.htm","siteSection":"COMPARE","companyComparisonUrl":"/Compare/IBM-vs-Accenture-EI_IE354-E4138.htm"},{"employerId":354,"interestEmployerId":613,"shortName":"AT\u0026T","reviewCount":22864,"reviewRating":3.38,"photoLogoUrl":"sqls/613/at-and-t-squarelogo-1463504999712.png","formattedReviewCount":"22,864","currentSectionUrl":"/Compare/AT-and-T-Company-Comparisons-E613.htm","reviewsUrl":"/Reviews/AT-and-T-Reviews-E613.htm","siteSection":"COMPARE","companyComparisonUrl":"/Compare/IBM-vs-AT-and-T-EI_IE354-E613.htm"},{"employerId":354,"interestEmployerId":8450,"shortName":"PwC","reviewCount":26953,"reviewRating":3.81,"photoLogoUrl":"sqls/8450/pwc-squarelogo.png","formattedReviewCount":"26,953","currentSectionUrl":"/Compare/PwC-Company-Comparisons-E8450.htm","reviewsUrl":"/Reviews/PwC-Reviews-E8450.htm","siteSection":"COMPARE","companyComparisonUrl":"/Compare/IBM-vs-PwC-EI_IE354-E8450.htm"},{"employerId":354,"interestEmployerId":1519,"shortName":"Intel Corporation","reviewCount":14157,"reviewRating":4.17,"photoLogoUrl":"sqls/1519/intel-corporation-squarelogo-1515609455196.png","formattedReviewCount":"14,157","currentSectionUrl":"/Compare/Intel-Corporation-Company-Comparisons-E1519.htm","reviewsUrl":"/Reviews/Intel-Corporation-Reviews-E1519.htm","siteSection":"COMPARE","companyComparisonUrl":"/Compare/IBM-vs-Intel-Corporation-EI_IE354-E1519.htm"},{"employerId":354,"interestEmployerId":2784,"shortName":"EY","reviewCount":26335,"reviewRating":3.78,"photoLogoUrl":"sqls/2784/ey-squarelogo-1434645705166.png","formattedReviewCount":"26,335","currentSectionUrl":"/Compare/EY-Company-Comparisons-E2784.htm","reviewsUrl":"/Reviews/EY-Reviews-E2784.htm","siteSection":"COMPARE","companyComparisonUrl":"/Compare/IBM-vs-EY-EI_IE354-E2784.htm"},{"employerId":354,"interestEmployerId":1651,"shortName":"Microsoft","reviewCount":23846,"reviewRating":4.21,"photoLogoUrl":"sqls/1651/microsoft-squarelogo-1479856042252.png","formattedReviewCount":"23,846","currentSectionUrl":"/Compare/Microsoft-Company-Comparisons-E1651.htm","reviewsUrl":"/Reviews/Microsoft-Reviews-E1651.htm","siteSection":"COMPARE","companyComparisonUrl":"/Compare/IBM-vs-Microsoft-EI_IE354-E1651.htm"},{"employerId":354,"interestEmployerId":145,"shortName":"J.P. Morgan","reviewCount":19341,"reviewRating":3.91,"photoLogoUrl":"sqls/145/j-p-morgan-squarelogo-1479932535271.png","formattedReviewCount":"19,341","currentSectionUrl":"/Compare/J-P-Morgan-Company-Comparisons-E145.htm","reviewsUrl":"/Reviews/J-P-Morgan-Reviews-E145.htm","siteSection":"COMPARE","companyComparisonUrl":"/Compare/J-P-Morgan-vs-IBM-EI_IE145-E354.htm"}]
Employee Ratings Overall Rating (full-time and part-time employees only)
Positive Business Outlook
Salaries Salaries for similar jobs
Software Developer 239 Salaries
CA$77,337/yr
Project Manager 63 Salaries
CA$86,881/yr
Business Analyst 20 Salaries
CA$79,627/yr
Software Developer 8 Salaries
CA$78,318/yr
Project Manager 9 Salaries
CA$94,306/yr
Director 43 Salaries
CA$116,261/yr
What Employees Say Featured Review
Current Employee - Senior IT Specialist
I have been working at IBM full-time for more than a year
Pros
Job security for younger generation. Good work life balance
Cons
There are none i can think of now.
Current Employee - Senior Actuarial Associate
I have been working at Manulife full-time for more than a year
Pros
Big organization with a lot of Actuarial roles.
Very nice Senior Management in Actuarial teams that can teach you a lot
Work is visible and promotions can be quick and is becoming more merit-based....
Nnice study days for exams, good work-life balance, and ability to work remotely later. Great place to train and become an experienced actuary.
Show More Cons
Recent CEO change has brought a lot of re-organization, so you need to be adaptive. However, the focus of new management is good.
Advice to Management
Need to invest more into advertisement and recruitment to attract young actuarial talents.
