Compare GlaxoSmithKline vs AstraZeneca BETASee how working at GlaxoSmithKline vs. AstraZeneca compares on a variety of workplace factors. By comparing employers on employee ratings, salaries, reviews, pros/cons, job openings and more, you'll feel one step ahead of the rest. All salaries and reviews are posted by employees working at GlaxoSmithKline vs. AstraZeneca. Learn more about each company and apply to jobs near you.
- AstraZeneca scored higher in 9 areas: Overall Rating, Career Opportunities, Compensation & Benefits, Work-life balance, Senior Management, Culture & Values, CEO Approval, % Recommend to a friend and Positive Business Outlook.
What Employees Say
- GlaxoSmithKline had 96 more reviews than AstraZeneca that mentioned "Good benefits" as a Pro.
- "Work life balance" was the most mentioned Con at GlaxoSmithKline.
- "Senior management" was the most mentioned Con at AstraZeneca.
I have been working at AstraZeneca full-time for more than 3 years
Many learning opportunities, advancement opportunities, supportive coworkers, flexible schedule, great benefits, working on many ethics/public issues diligently
In sales organization, too many metrics/focus on metrics that takes time away from being in the field. The metrics do not always contribute to increase benefit/sales
Advice to Management
Some managers need more training or MBAs/professional leadership training/hire younger managers with significant leadership training/masters